How about we turn that article title around?
Obama stokes fear because it's good for business
I'm sure the Lame-stream media would be up in arms with me taking a perfectly good scare headline and turning it to my own use. But I'm trying to make a point -- you can say whatever you want, but just because you publish something doesn't make it any more or less true.Blaming Sandy Hook on guns is just deflecting the true problem. This gunman didn't kill people just because he happened to find a gun (or several), he killed people because he was mentally deranged. Sure, he had some high-powered weapons, but he could have killed many more people with some household ingredients turned into a bomb. The gun (or even type of gun) doesn't kill someone by itself; it takes a human to plan, to aim, to carry out the murder. And that's what it was, not "a gun incident" or "a shooting" -- the gunman shortened human lives.
Next, Biden turned to "violent video games." Is there nothing that didn't cause this? How about milk -- maybe the gunman was lactose intolerant? Sun spots? The fear of a meteorite crashing into the Earth?
Yes, I'm being funny by setting up straw men (I think I've heard it called "ad absurdem"), but trying to blame one simple cause is yet another logical fallacy -- causal oversimplification. You can't just say, "guns are bad" because a few morally depraved people use them for evil purposes. Using a gun for evil purposes is just the same as using ANYTHING for evil purposes.
Even logical fallacies.